" /> AHA Student Work: June 2005 Archives

« May 2005 | Main | July 2005 »

June 15, 2005

A SIMPSON SENSIBILITY By NEIL KAPIT

A secret that's not so secret in my life is that the vast majority of my
sense of humor, when I choose to reveal it, is taken from the Simpsons. I
have found that just by quoting the venerable animated series, I can draw a
laugh in most scenarios. Obviously there are some situations where the
wisdom of Homer ( the nuclear technician, not the Greek poet ) don't apply,
but I'm hard pressed to think of them.

In fact, I'd not only say that the Simpsons is one of ( if not the )
funniest things to grace television ever, I'd say it's a major cultural
touchstone that should be required viewing for everyone. The appeal is
nigh-universal, and the breadth of topics the show covers is infinite. I've
seen just about every episode of the show, and they've covered everything
from politics to religion, from children to the elderly, from obscure
literature to pop culture, from alcoholism to zoos. There truly is something
for everyone.

But it's not just that the show addresses so many different topics, it's how
they do it, with endless wit and panache. They rarely just state the obvious
with an issue, they deal with it from multiple sides and show the many
different facets of the topic du jour. If an episode features an issue,
they'll address it from all angles. It's not like the other really popular
adult cartoon, South Park, where there's a heavy-handed ( usually right-wing
) moral, the Simpsons paints a more sophisticated picture of the world.

Then there's the little things. Each episode is chock full of all sorts of
little references and blurbs. It's not enough to have a main plot for each
show, the writers pack them with various little in-jokes and references to
pop culture, history, even previous episodes. The shows feel very heavy in
terms of content, like they're packed with information, rather than fluff
meant for mindless entertainment. ( I can't tell you how much trivia about
life and the world I've learned from following the show all these years ).

And finally, there's the cast. There is no show with as many memorable
characters. Obviously everyone knows the main family and some of the
recurring second-stringers, but the characters number in the hundreds, and
even one-note jokes make repeat performances. Who would have known that the
crusty old Sea Captain would become one of pop culture's most memorable
faces? Or that the Comic Book Guy would go on to single-handedly define an
entire subculture of fans? Well, if you watched the show, you probably would
have known by the quality of the episodes, but still.

So you mix topical relevance with intelligent writing with a great cast, and
you have a blueprint for what scripted TV should be ( and usually isn't ).
If you aren't watching the show regularly, you should be. It's your civic
duty.

ANOTHER NEIL KAPIT COMMENTARY

There's been a lot of talk about the living situation of the current
generation of young adults-- specifically, that they haven't moved out yet.
Called the "adultolescents" or "twixters" or whatever clever euphemism
the media has come up with, these young people still live at home after
school, and are still supported by their parents.

Whenever the media writes about these "twixters", no matter how hard they
try to be fair and balanced, there's always a hint of condescension, even
scorn. The articles imply that there's something wrong with the
adultolescent generation, that they haven't been able to find a job and move
out like the previous generation could. They're portrayed as immature, lazy
slackers, Peter Pans who never want to grow up. Their problems could be
solved by supporting themselves.

Unfortunately, supporting yourself as a young person in America isn't as
easy as many would have you believe.

Ask almost any young person trying to find a job; it's just difficult to
find work. Especially good work, the kind of work that someone would
actually want. Even menial jobs are tough to acquire. Speaking from personal
experience, I have not been able to find an entry-level position after much
searching and frustration. Many of my peers are in the same boat, as well.

How did this happen? Part of it may be due to the shrinking middle class,
the expanding gap between the rich and poor. The good jobs are moving into
the white collar sector, while the more menial jobs are paying less and
requiring more hours. Many jobs have been lost since the Bush Administration
took hold of this country, and benefits are being garnished as well as wages
for the jobs that exist.

It's a complex situation, but one thing is for sure-- with the economy the
way it is, supporting oneself ( especially in a luxurious town like Santa
Barbara ) is no small feat. Finding a job in order to make ends meet is
difficult for an inexperienced young person; finding a job that supports a
comfortable living is even harder. Is it any wonder that so many young
people instead decide to stay at home, with Mom and Dad footing the bill?

These people are not necessarily lazy and unmotivated slackers. Many are
trying to get meaningful employment. They just can't find it, and without
that, couldn't make it on their own. Maybe they just can't leave the nest,
but it's hard for the proverbial hatchling to leave its nest when there are
gale force winds blowing through the trees.

So next time you hear about the "adultolescents" and "twixters", reserve
judgment. Don't chastise them immediately for not moving out sooner.
Everyone matures at a different rate, and sometimes the tools needed for
proper maturation are hard to acquire. Especially with the economy the way
it is.