" /> AHA Student Work: December 2005 Archives

« November 2005 | Main | January 2006 »

December 23, 2005

Great Relationship Advice Part Ten, By Alison Poulsen, PhD

Sour facial expressions lead to divorce: Cutting out criticism and contempt

John Gottman, who wrote Why Marriages Succeed or Fail after studying 2000 married couples over two decades, found that contempt, criticism, and defensiveness ultimately lead to divorce. Yet, we shouldn’t go through relationships ignoring problems and complaints. The key is to make specific requests with a neutral tone of voice, instead of making broad negative judgments, such as “you’re always complaining.” You can state specific needs or feelings without exaggerating the facts.
Specific Requests versus negative judgment
Here are a few examples of how to change a negative judgment into a constructive request. Note that the most important part of the message is tone of voice.

E.g., Negative criticism: “You never help me with the dishes.”
Specific request: “It would be great if you’d help me with the dishes tonight.”

E.g., Negative criticism: “I hate it when you leave me hanging. You’re selfish and you care more about your friends than me.”
Specific request: “I felt worried and then angry when I expected you at 7 and didn’t hear from you until 9. Would you call me if you’re going to be late in the future?”

E.g., Negative criticism: “We never go out.”
Specific request: “I’d like to go out more. Let’s go out this weekend.”

Contempt and defensiveness
Contempt expresses the feeling of dislike toward somebody. It implies that he or she is worthless and undeserving of respect. Contempt is conveyed through insults, name-calling, tone of voice, as well as facial expressions. Contempt eats away at a relationship rapidly and painfully. A study has shown that people who make sour facial expressions when their spouses talk are likely to be separated within four years (Gottman, 1994).
In an atmosphere of contempt, partners find it difficult to remember one positive quality of their partners. Conflict escalates and prevents meaningful communication.
Here are several unpleasant ways to show one’s contempt:

1. Insults and name-calling are the most conspicuous and crude—you’re ugly, a jerk, a wimp, etc.

2. Hostile humor covers contempt with a thin veil of comic relief, often followed by the excuse, “I was just trying to be funny.” E.g., “Her cooking’s so bad she can’t even boil water.”

3. Mockery is a subtle put-down, where the spouse’s words or actions are ridiculed to show he or she is not worthy of respect or trust. A man may tell his wife, for example, “I really do care about you,” and she replies sarcastically, “Oh sure, you really do care about me.”

4. Body language, such as rolling one’s eyes or sneering, gives the clearest clue that a couple is in trouble.

What if you have a partner who holds contempt for you or criticizes you a lot?
1. Don’t be drawn into contempt, criticism or defensiveness. You can stand up for yourself, but without joining in the sneering, ridiculing, and hostile negative judgments.
2. Require an attitude of mutual respect as a foundation for any discussion. In a court of law, the procedural rules must be followed before the merits of the case can be heard. In relationship, the procedural rules require that both sides listen to the other person’s feelings and opinions respectfully. If the other person persists in showing contempt, suggest having a discussion in the presence of a counselor or mediator.
With an attitude of respect, people can discuss any difficult issues—sexuality, separation, weight problems, and money problems, for example. Without respect, you can’t discuss how to set the table without being inflammatory.
3. The most difficult but transformative course of action is to become aware of how we unknowingly feed the external critic (our partner), and thus participate in the cycle of contempt and criticism.
We all have an inner critic–the voice in our head that monitors our behavior. It prevents us from yelling in a movie theater or showing up at work three hours late. Yet, there’s a point where the inner critic no longer helps us but taunts and persecutes us without mercy. In some cases, the inner critic can completely block a person and cause despair. The inner critic is also what allows us to accept certain criticism regardless of its exaggeration or the scornful attitude in which it’s delivered.
Each person is usually vulnerable to specific types of criticism, probably because of childhood experiences or excessive criticism received in specific areas while growing up. The inner critic becomes excessively harsh in these areas in order to catch the person making “mistakes” before someone on the outside does. Criticism in these areas is experienced very painfully, and is either accepted without question or defended against adamantly. Thus, it turns out that our own inner critic becomes an ally of the external critic.

So, the most effective way of dealing with repeated criticism from the outside is to deal with these parts of our inner critic that are over zealous. We must become aware of the inner critic while it’s at work, and then attempt to moderate its over zealous attitude with reality. The external critic then loses its collaborator in us, making the affront less potent.
Imagine a woman was brought up to value courtesy and to detest rudeness. Her inner critic watches her behavior to make sure that she is friendly and nice. When her husband or children say, “you’re being mean” or “that’s rude”, she feels ashamed and hurt or becomes very defensive. If she had no hook in her—that is, no inner critic who’s severely offended by meanness and rudeness—her response would be less heated and intense. Without a strong hook, she might answer without anger or sarcasm, “That’s right, sometimes I am mean.” Or “I call it ‘being direct’, not rude.” Without a hook luring in certain criticisms, defensiveness loses its heat. As a result, the criticisms dissipate.
Imagine a man who has a strong inner critic about being lazy. Whenever he relaxes, there’s a voice in his head that says, “You’re lazy and good-for-nothing.” Suppose he’s on the couch reading a magazine, and hears his partner ask, “What are you doing?” That might be enough to activate his inner critic and make him sneer, “What’s wrong with relaxing once in a while?!” On the other hand, if he became aware of his excessive sensitivity due to his inner critic’s relentlessness, he might say without guilt or anger, “Just relaxing” or “I’m reading a great article from sunvalleyonline.com.”
Contempt is similar to criticism, although it is stronger in that it implies general worthlessness and inferiority. We need to become aware of how we participate in receiving contempt. It is our own inner hook that allows us to accept a scornful “you’re pathetic” or a tone of voice that says as much. Once we’ve modified our inner critic to improve our lives instead of humiliating and hindering us, then we might respond to contempt with a calm but poignant, “Excuse me? Are you sure you want to talk to me that way?”
It is not easy to become aware of the unconscious voices in our heads. Yet, it is exciting to think that through such awareness we can develop more choices in our lives— the choice of how we respond to our inner critic as well as the choice of how to respond to others’ criticism of us.


Recommended books:
Gottman, John, Ph.D. (1994). Why Marriages Succeed or Fail, Simon & Schuster, New York.

Stone, Hal, Ph.D., and Stone, Sidra, Ph.D. (1993). Embracing Your Inner Critic, HarperCollins Publisher, New York.

( Send comments to http://blog.sunvalleyonline.com/index.php/author/couples-solutions/ )

( or email Alison Poulsen at alisonpoulsen@cox.net )

Great Relationship Advice Part Nine, By Alison Poulsen, PhD

The Insidious Triangle:
How to avoid triangulation and gossip

Triangulation

Have you ever felt uneasy when a friend complains to you about his or her partner? Triangulation involves one person complaining to a third person about a primary relationship in order to temporarily vent anxiety, not to gain insight. Triangulation differs from having a conversation with someone to gain understanding or to seek options to deal with a problem.

Being drawn into triangulation is very draining, because you are asked to take sides rather than to have a dialogue. People may temporarily feel connected through the power of secrets, but in the end, inexhaustible complaining is emotionally enervating to everyone.

Although triangulating someone into an angst-ridden relationship may temporarily relieve anxiety, it is quite insidious. It is particularly harmful when one parent complains to a child about the other parent, because it puts extraordinary pressure on the child. The child generally wants any kind of connection he or she can get with a parent, even if that entails being a confidant, but feels discomfort and guilt in betraying the other parent.

Often, when anxiety overloads the initial triangle, others are triangulated into the process, thus forming a series of interlocking triangles. For example, a mother complains about her husband to her son, who then complains to his sister, who then complains to her father. Each person’s alliance is dependent on others’ anxiety and inability to relate directly to the person with whom they are experiencing problems. This is not a good foundation for developing life-enhancing relationships.

How do we avoid triangulation?

We should avoid taking sides, but remain in contact with both sides. We can express neutrality and objectivity, or use humor while relating to the mature part of the person venting. Here are some examples:

“I think it would be more helpful if you talked to him about how you feel, rather than to me.”

“Since we can’t change her, let’s figure out how you might have participated in this situation.”

“I value my friendship with both of you. So, I would prefer not being in the middle.”

“I feel uncomfortable when you tell me such private details of your married life.”

“I feel unqualified to give you advice. I think this is something you might bring to a therapist.”

“I think I know how this story is going to go. Do you see a pattern in the situation? Maybe you could do something differently.”

Gossip
Gossip is unconstrained and often derogatory conversation about other people, and can involve betraying a confidence and spreading sensitive information. Gossip is a form of triangulation, in that it is based on a desire to relieve anxiety by alienating others, whether or not one is in actual relationship with them.
Research shows that people who gossip the most have very high levels of anxiety. They are generally not particularly popular because they cannot be trusted (Dr. Rosnow). Spreading private information or negative judgments is painful to others and reflects poorly on the gossiper.
Why do people gossip?

To feel superior

People who don’t feel good about themselves temporarily feel better when they judge others negatively.

Out of envy

People gossip in order to hurt those whose popularity, talents, or lifestyle they envy.
To feel like part of the group


People gossip to feel as though they belong to the group. Yet, when a feeling of acceptance is based on being “in on a secret,” it is based on exclusion.
For attention


A person gets to be the center of attention temporarily while divulging a piece of gossip. Yet, spreading gossip or rumors is like buying attention—it’s temporary and has little foundation.
Out of boredom


When people can’t generate interesting discussions based on knowledge or ideas, gossip can rouse people’s interest.

Out of anger or unhappiness


A person can derive a sense of retribution with disparaging remarks.


Is it always wrong to talk about others?

It can be fine to talk about other people. Most people have a natural curiosity about what’s going on among people in the community. Some of the best books are biographies that tell the life stories of other people. However, the best biographies give the reader an understanding of the nuance and complexity of the person’s character through facts. They are not based on one-sided, offensive judgments of the person. The key is to look at one’s intent in discussing other people and relationships.

Is the intent to understand human nature or to improve the quality of life or relationships?

Or: Is it to temporarily feel superior by disparaging others?


Responses to unwelcome gossip:

Let’s suppose that somebody is gossiping mercilessly about Jane. We may not want to offend the other person, because we are all only human. Here are some possible responses:

“I notice that you talk about Jane a lot. I’m curious why she in particular interests you so much?”

“Let’s take a look at it from Jane’s side.”

“I am more interested in what you are up to.”

“Let’s talk about something more positive or inspiring, or make some plans.”

Conclusion

Gossip and triangulation diminish us and pull us down — both, the gossiper/triangulator and the listener. On the other hand, if we focus on understanding human beings rather than alienating them, everyone is apt to gain. Ultimately, insight into the intricacies of human relations and behavior is more interesting and enlightening than one-dimensional judgments and rumors.

Recommended Reading:

On triangulation: Kerr, Michael, and Bowen, Murray (1988), Family Evaluation, W. W. Norton & Company, New York.

On gossip: http://pbskids.org/itsmylife/friends/rumors/article4.html


( Send comments to http://blog.sunvalleyonline.com/index.php/author/couples-solutions/ )

( or email Alison Poulsen at alisonpoulsen@cox.net )

December 22, 2005

Reprinted Casa Magazine Essay by Neil Kapit


Being different is always a dangerous proposition. Fortunately for those of us who are, there are groups like the Academy of the Healing Arts ( AHA! for short ).

Recently I was diagnosed with a mild form of Asperger’s Syndrome, a high-functioning form of autism characterized by high intelligence, obsessive focus, motor skill impairments, and poor social skills. There is no single known cause, and there is no cure. Those of us with AS basically have to navigate human society blindly, working hard to learn the social cues that come naturally to everyone else. Needless to say, school has been a struggle for me; while I consistently get good grades, I have been bullied and harassed by my peers for no reason other than being an easy target. The only sanctuary I had was in comic books, an art form which I had obsessed over for years.

When I first came to AHA!, I had just come off of an extremely painful ninth grade year, and was desperately seeking friendship. I was welcomed there with open arms. I did not know how to respond to this at first; to be treated with kindness instead of hostility or judgment was an incredible shock. For months, I just sat in the corner of the room, listening to other people talk but never speaking myself.

Eventually, things started to change. Listening to other people’s challenges, I began to understand that I was not alone. There were others with similar problems, some even worse off than me. And they were all in the same room, ready and willing to support each other. As I learned about other people, I began to understand myself better, and was able to participate. I have been participating for five years since. What’s more, they encouraged me to follow my dreams of being a cartoonist, and I now have several published cartoons on the AHA! websites.

I’m not going to lie and say that I am cured of my problems. My condition is such that I will always have difficulty reading people, so it is very hard to trust anyone. Even in AHA!, where I know virtually everyone, I can’t always open up. But the program has been constant in my life. As I go to the groups, I know that everyone there cares. People who would never meet outside of AHA!, people from all sorts of different backgrounds, come together to form a community. They share their own personal challenges, and gain strength from each other. In a culture that teaches us to close off our feelings and pretend that we’re “ okay “, AHA! offers a chance to admit that we’re not, and work on our problems together.

The Academy of Healing Arts is a nonprofit program sponsored by the Family Therapy Institute, which has four after school groups for teens and young adults Monday through Thursday. There is also an intensive summer program for the participants every weekday morning in July, and an evening group for parents of the participants.