Main

November 27, 2006

Walking in Honesty, Walking in Peace by Sandy

We all have addictions, flaws ad mistakes we make in our lives. We are human and it is natural for us to do all these things. However, certain behaviors are not tolerated when you want to be a successful person and keep worthy friendships. Lying is one of the behaviors that is not tolerated and should not be. When we lie we are not only hurting the people we lie too, we are also hurting ourselves. Its something that hurts just as if we had committed a crime. Everybody knows lying is bad, whether it’s a white lie or a compulsive lie. It is not the truth therefore it is wrong.
There are many factors that cause people to lie, one of them is fear. We fear we are not good enough , that our truth is not good enough. At times we think the easiest way out of fear is lying, not facing our reality. Fear relates to low self-esteem, because if we were confident we would not have to be afraid of our truth. Another reason that we lie is because we are angry, angry at someone or something. We think life isn’t fair therefore we try to change our lives by lying. The ironic thing about lying is that we think it will avoid conflict however, it only brings more conflict to our lives.
Breaking an agreement is quite like lying. We say we are going to do something, agree on doing it and then take no course of action to do it; breaking the agreement. There are many excuses or reasons that prevent us from keeping our agreement. It still doesn’t matter to the other person to whom we made that agreement to. As far as they know we lied and disrespected them by not keeping the agreement. That is why we must take action. We create our own world, and we are responsible for the choices we make. One must do whatever it takes to make the right choice in order to benefit both parties.
When we lie to people whoever it may be family, teachers, strangers or friends we are disrespecting them and expressing that they aren’t important enough to hear the truth. One thing that can break a relationship between two people is wrecking trust. Trust is something that takes many years to build and yet so little to break. Why cause that damage on that relationship? The lie itself is carried on one's shoulders and its like unsolved puzzle that never seizes to leave one’s mind. It can really cause damage in our lives.
Actions such as lying and breaking agreements can be avoided and spare the feeling of those involved. This can be done by thinking of the other party involved and just how much ones actions will affect them. One must then ask questions such as, are those people important to me, do I want people not to trust me? All these questions and more play a significant role in the choices we make. The most important question however is, what is the consequence of my action? If the answer is harm or pain then think twice about what you will do.
There isn’t a better feeling than having integrity, the feeling itself is so comforting more comforting than the feeling of lying. When one speaks with truth the mind, body, soul feel completely liberated. That is why we should free ourselves from lies and let ourselves be and show those people of who we really are, not be afraid, not be afraid of those around us, not to be afraid of ourselves. Being free is the most gratifying feeling one can experience because there is no negativity surrounding one. We should love and cherish ourselves by loving ourselves and walking in honesty in order to walk in peace.

September 18, 2006

MAKING TRACKS comments from Neil K

I credit my steady ( albiet gradual ) success to everything I have learned
at AHA!. In the five years I attended AHA!, I learned an incredible amount
of knowledge that would never have come anywhere else. In addition to
actually having social experiences, I learned about the benefits of
acceptance, brotherhood, empathy, and open communication. In short, I gained
something to believe in. I owe everything to the support I was given at AHA!

September 13, 2006

thankful Jocelyn

you got up
made me tea
you wiped the counter
where i had spilled the cream
you dressed for work
yet again
as i typed on the computer
you called me to remind me of .......
you probably thought of me alot during the day
you made me dinner while i pretended to do homework
All i did was slide out of your body one bristly morning and now you still give me LIFE

dash

it didn't happen that fast
slow like knives dull cutting hard skin
it took me under
i breathed in like smoke was in my lungs
now
it is slow
water dripping from rusty faucet
fog wrapping coastline
flooded carpets in the entryway
slow in the way of wrinkles and gray
Do you remember what it was like before?
like the first time ice cream sweetened your tongue

February 16, 2006

Great Relationship Advice Part Thirteen, By Alison Poulsen, PhD

Desire out of fullness

Desire out of a sense of fullness leads to more desire and intimacy for both partners, whereas desire out of emptiness is consumptive, draining, and diminishes over time.

Desire out of emptiness

The biological notion of desire as a drive to relieve tensions treats sex as merely a means to gratification. Using another person either for biological gratification or psychological validation grows out of a desire to fill a void. Sadly, desire out of emptiness cannot be fulfilled, because the desire to be gratified or validated is insatiable. Moreover, a person becomes less desirable when desire stems from a sense of need or inadequacy. In “The Sexual Crucible,” David Schnarch points out that even “spouses who initially have a healthy appetite for sex eventually resent being used to feed a partner’s self-esteem and dependency.”

When desire turns to hunger and consumption

The longing for wholeness can translate into a literal devouring of food, money, knowledge, or sex. Hunger desires nourishment, but in its absence can get fixated on consumption. The hunger for sex, the hoarding of material things, and the regurgitation of knowledge are paltry substitutes for real spiritual and emotional nourishment and growth. If the metaphorical longing for wholeness collapses into hunger for immediate gratification or validation, its appetite can grow to monstrous proportions. Desire out of emptiness consumes with unappeasable voraciousness. One recognizes devouring hunger’s doom in Danté’s description of hell, where the Wolf is “gaunt with the famished craving.”

Vicious her nature is, and framed for ill;
When crammed she craves more fiercely than before;
            Her raging greed can never gorge its fill.
            (Alighieri, Danté, (1949). The Divine Comedy I: Hell. New York: Penguin Group.)
 
Being needed versus being wanted

The fear of being alone often causes people to prefer the security of being needed over the insecurity of being wanted. This may lead people to perpetuate their partner’s neediness. They may over-function in taking care of the children, household, or finances to increase their partner’s dependency on them. When people become highly dependent on their partners, they tend to limit intimacy and eroticism, unless they develop their ability to tolerate anxiety.

Desire requires tolerating anxiety

A low level of anxiety enhances desire by increasing receptivity, awareness, and focus. This heightened attention is exemplified in the excitement of traveling, where the new smells, sights and experiences enhance the traveler’s awareness.

Both fear and excitement involve anxiety about the unknown. While heightened awareness and excitement enhance feeling, severe anxiety blocks it. If levels of anxiety get too high for a particular person’s comfort level, desire diminishes, triggering the freeze or flight response.

Thus, desire requires the ability to self-soothe and withstand tension. People who tolerate very little anxiety have a smaller window through which to experience desire. The greater one’s tolerance is for withstanding anxiety, the greater is the window of desire.

Fear of rejection and loss

Until we can tolerate potential heartache, disappointment and fears, moving into the realm of intense desire is not safe, for it opens us up to loss in the future. Only our willingness to tolerate loss and disappointment allows us to expose ourselves to desire’s risks.

Desire problems surface when the importance of our partner’s reactions exceeds our own ability to withstand anxiety. Desire for our partner becomes too risky. We don’t dare expose new ideas or new parts of ourselves, for we don’t dare face our partner’s looks of surprise, rejection, or withdrawal. Thus, people with little ability to withstand anxiety either end up in relationships with low desire or seek new partners once a relationship gets too intimate for their comfort level. They fear rejection and loss.

Stagnancy in relationship born of fear of change and growth is the primary cause of diminishing desire.

Imagine that an athletic, tom-boyish woman who has been married for ten years, wants to develop her feminine qualities (or vice versa). When she starts developing that new part of herself, her partner may feel threatened—“What are you doing?!” may be the reaction. If her fear of her partner’s reaction is too great, she might fall back into her predictable way of behaving. She would then miss out on developing into a more multifaceted person in order to avoid raising the anxiety levels in the relationship. As a result of maintaining the status quo, desire will diminish for both partners.

In contrast, if she can hang on and validate herself in face of negative reactions, she will grow, the relationship will become more multidimensional, and desire is likely to flourish in both partners.
 
Desire out of fullness

Desire out of fullness arises out of a sense of self as desirable, rather than out of a need for validation or gratification from the partner. This is not a narcissistic sense of MTV vanity, but an appreciation of one’s own value. People become more attractive in that they exude self-respect when they change or try new things and tolerate apprehension regardless of “success” or “failure”.  

Schnarch maintains that desire out of fullness without any guarantee of success is the essence of spirituality. Like spirituality, intimate desire involves a component of faith in yourself, that is, being able to express desire despite not knowing the outcome. You need faith in your the ability to keep living passionately even when your desire may not fulfilled. The potential rewards are well worth the risks.

Sebastian Moore, a Benedictine priest, distinguishes desire as hunger from spiritual desire that grows through satiation. He says “we desire not because we are hungry but because we are full.” Martin Prechtel, a Guatemalan Shaman, makes a similar point in distinguishing between

seduction—the act of getting what you want—and courting (like desire out of fullness)—the act of giving blessing to what you love.

Fullness allows for greater desire, appreciation, and zeal for the other without an accompanying needy hunger to possess and devour the other. With the ability to tolerate the discomfort of growth, desire becomes the process of re-creating oneself and honoring one’s partner in their growth. As one is able to let more of oneself be known, desire and intimacy deepen.

Schnarch, David. (1993). Problems of Sexual Desire: Who Really Wants to Want? (Audio) www.passionatemarriage.com.

Schnarch, David. (1991). Constructing the sexual crucible: Paradigm-shift in sexual and marital therapy. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.

Great Relationship Advice Part Twelve, By Alison Poulsen, PhD

Honoring Primary Linkage

Are you connecting more with your children, your friends, or the internet than your partner?

Primary Linkage

When your partner is demoted to second place behind the children, a pet, a friend, or the internet—the partnership is bound to deteriorate. This does not mean that we have to neglect our children or friends, but that we always put our partner first, and let him or her know it.

“Linkage” is the energetic connection one experiences through relationships with people, animals, and favorite activities. Primary linkage is the relationship through which one experiences primary connection. Whether you currently have a primary partner or not, having connection with a variety of friends, family members, and activities can provide joy and richness. However, if you want to sustain a good primary relationship, the priority you give to your various preferences is vital.

Primary linkages sometimes go to the internet, reading, or addictions rather than to one’s partner. Some people find that primary linkage to a pet is the only kind of linkage that is satisfying, as it is safe, reciprocal, and void of complications. All of these linkages, if they become primary, lead to less linkage between partners. When couples predominantly focus their energy on people or activities other than their primary partner, they don’t nurture the relationship or deal with hurt feelings and unmet desires. Unspoken feelings become silent judgments and disappointment. Most divorces can be traced back to the shift of primary linkage from the partner to someone or something else.

Linkage with the Children

A major challenge for most couples arises when they have children. Young children need a great deal of love and attention, and respond very positively to linkage. Of course linkage with our children is absolutely necessary and rewarding. It is also often easier to obtain energetic connection from children than from an adult, because they are dependent and they reciprocate easily. As a result, it is quite common at this stage for a parent to shift his or her primary linkage to the children. Ideally, we bond with our children, while retaining primary connection with our partner. The problem occurs when the primary linkage shifts permanently to the child.

Imagine that Anne, who is warm and friendly, is married to John, who is cooler and impersonal. Once they have children, Anne’s natural warmth feels nurtured and reciprocated through her children’s affection. This is quite natural. Yet, if the linkage with John is not nourished, because it’s easier to get the linkage through her children, the whole family system suffers. While John may not communicate any problem with this shift in energy, he is likely to feel it. As a result of the underlying feeling of abandonment, he may plunge deeper into work and outside activities. Eventually, he may be susceptible to the warm attentions of another woman, missing this within his primary relationship.

Such linkage to the children is not healthy for Anne or the children either. Anne’s linkage with her children, being based on their dependence, cannot be as whole, equal, and multifaceted as the linkage with her partner. The children may feel increasing demand to respond to their parent’s dependence on their affection. Children feel increasingly burdened if they are the primary source of linkage for the parent.

Nothing benefits a growing child more than to see well-adjusted parents, who are caring, and actively engaged in their own lives. Children feel secure when parents take care of themselves and honor each other. A loving partnership between two adults who are emotionally, intellectually, physically, and even spiritually committed to one another is much richer and more multifaceted than a relation between an adult and a child, pet, or electronic device. It’s not appropriate to attempt to have such a partnership with a child, because of the inbuilt inequality and dependence of the child on the parent. Moreover, role-modeling a primary partnership, or some sort of satisfying equal adult relationships, to our children gives them much more than giving them all of our attention and energy.

This is not to say that we should not love, nurture, and give attention to our children. The parent child relation can be irreplaceably magical and special, but not to be confused with an equal and reciprocal adult partnership.

If you can’t go anywhere without your children or have lost the desire to spend time alone with your partner, this indicates that the primary linkage has shifted away from your partner. “The more you and your partner drift apart, the more each of you will link with one or more of the children. The more you link with the child, the more you will drift apart from you partner. The cycle never ends.” (Stone, Hal, Ph.D. & Stone, Sidra, Ph.D. (2000) Partnering, New World Library.)

Suggestions to avoid this cycle

Don’t take your partner for granted. At home, make efforts to enjoy each other and engage in every-day consideration and graciousness. Simple courtesy can keep the primary linkage strong. If you’re on the internet, working, or with the children, and your partner walks into the room, don’t ignore him or her. You don’t need to drop everything, but friendly acknowledgment shows the importance you place on your relationship.

Also, teach your children that they don’t have constant access to you at all times in all places in the home, especially in the master bedroom. Make sure you create boundaries to ensure that you have privacy at certain times and in certain places in the home. Otherwise, it’s easy to become parents only instead of partners. With clearly-defined boundaries, children are not likely to feel rejected. It’s healthy for the children to see the value you place on your primary relationship.

Make regularly-scheduled dates or special rituals together. Spend time alone without the children in addition to family time. Occasional excursions away from home adds freshness and excitement. It’s energizing to step into the unfamiliar with your partner.

 

 

Recommended reading: Stone, Hal, Ph.D. & Stone, Sidra, Ph.D. (2000) Partnering, New World Library.

February 12, 2006

Great Relationship Advice Part Eleven, By Alison Poulsen

Projection:
A gateway to new realms

What is Projection?
That which remains unconscious, Carl Jung wrote, gets projected on to another person. For example, Pete may blame his wife for having given up his dreams of traveling the islands with a surfboard, unaware of his own unconscious desire for a stable lifestyle. Debbie may blame her husband for their decision not to have children, unaware of her own fear of such responsibility.

Projection is an automatic process where someone ascribes unconscious thoughts or qualities to another person. We carry the seeds of all qualities within us. Yet, many qualities remain unconscious, in that they are unacknowledged, repressed, or incompatible with our self-image. As a result, the unconscious is both attracted to and repulsed by those qualities, and tends to detect them in others. Becoming aware of our projections ultimately opens the way to growth and transformation.

The Difference between Description and Projection
Projections get cast onto persons with a suitable hook, that is, those who embody the qualities we project. Remember the film Chocolat? The whole town, and in particular the mayor, projected their repressed sensuality on to the woman in red shoes, Juliette Binoche, who carried the projection well.

What, then, distinguishes an accurate description from a projection? When heat and emotion accompany an observation, it’s more than mere observation. Awe and admiration, or disgust and hatred indicate projection. The emotion of projection stems from our having disowned a part of ourselves we now glimpse in another. When we disown qualities in ourselves, we often do so out of fear, because those qualities were not acceptable in our family or sub-culture. Later in life, there is often a desire to evoke that lost part of ourselves. Thus, the underlying fear or desire provide the emotion of projection.

For example, if we were taught to blend in and not to act big, later in life we may be drawn to some people and bothered by others who have big personalities.

Projecting Desirable and Undesirable Qualities
When we consider desirable qualities such as creativity, sensuality, or leadership as incompatible with our self-image, they often get projected onto others, with the result of adulation, infatuation, and falling in love. For example, Maria sees herself as extraverted and gregarious, and may become infatuated with someone who is more quiet and self-contained.

When we judge certain traits to be unacceptable and incompatible with our self-image, we may project them on to someone we don’t want to be like, and develop an aversion towards that person. For instance, John sees himself as kind and generous, unfamiliar of his own sense of entitlement and greed, and thus detests others he sees as greedy.

Often, we prefer to hide or ignore attributes we view as negative such as aggressiveness or selfishness. Yet, having such qualities accessible in moderate doses can be crucial for survival and fulfillment. No quality is negative in itself. Harm results only when a trait becomes excessive or displayed inappropriately. For example, a small dose of aggressiveness allows one to take a stand, to have boundaries, and to defend oneself from harm. A small dose of selfishness allows one to survive and to enjoy the fruits of life.

Benefits and Problems of Projection
All impassioned, “almost-magical” relationships between people involve projection. The value of projection is that it releases energies that have been dormant. The release of energy felt in infatuation and in loathing may lead one to realize that that which inspires or disturbs us, is in us as well. Becoming aware of our projections may lead to our awakening to a new world that is unfamiliar to us, such as a world of creativity, sensuality, solemnity, light-heartedness, even greed, and toughness. For instance, the familiarity with our own ability to be tough can alert us and help us deal with other’s excessive aggressiveness. Without awareness of our own potential to be aggressive, we become victims to every bully, including the unconscious bully within us.

If projections remain unconscious, however, they can wreak havoc in our lives. Take the mayor in the film "Chocolat." He upholds a strict moral attitude forbidding himself and others sensuality, which is symbolized by eating chocolates. In the end, however, he wantonly succumbs to his repressed desire and devours as much as he can in a state of mad delirium. The repression of his own sensuality is so severe that it gets the better of him. Had he acknowledged his own sensuality, he would have feared it less, and it would have been less of a danger to him.

Projections that remain unconscious block our ability to be perceptive and objective about ourselves and others. Sooner or later the person placed on a pedestal won’t be able to live up to our expectations. Worse, projected qualities of those we admire and those we detest remain inaccessible for personal integration and growth.

What can we do with our Projections?
Many marriages are ruined, because a man sees his mother in his wife and a woman sees her father in her husband, neither ever recognizing the other’s reality. If handled properly, however, marriage can encourage growth and transformation.

To grow within a partnership requires opening oneself up to unknown emotions and qualities while retaining adequate ego strength not to be devoured by them. Our task is to take back the projections and restore the contents to the owner—ourselves. Taking back projections opens a person to new realms that demand the courage to explore.

We need to refrain from demanding that our partners do what we must do for ourselves. For example, let's assume we see our partner as being too frugal, and wish he would be more generous. First, we could learn about and develop some frugality ourselves. Not only do we grow, but our interaction regarding the subject will be more effective if we are coming from a moderate position, rather than from the another extreme. When we understand the merits of frugality, our requests that our partner loosen up his or her spending a little is communicated with more compassion.

When we take back projections, we no longer worship or detest others, because we recognize the seed of their qualities in ourselves. Negative qualities become positive qualities when they are present appropriately in moderation. Moreover, our own world of experience and understanding expands, and our relationships deepen.

Jung, C.G. (1961). Memories, dreams, reflections. New York: Vintage.

Jung, C.G. (1981). The development of personality in R. F. C. Hull (Trans.) The collected Works (vol. 17). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1954)


December 23, 2005

Great Relationship Advice Part Ten, By Alison Poulsen, PhD

Sour facial expressions lead to divorce: Cutting out criticism and contempt

John Gottman, who wrote Why Marriages Succeed or Fail after studying 2000 married couples over two decades, found that contempt, criticism, and defensiveness ultimately lead to divorce. Yet, we shouldn’t go through relationships ignoring problems and complaints. The key is to make specific requests with a neutral tone of voice, instead of making broad negative judgments, such as “you’re always complaining.” You can state specific needs or feelings without exaggerating the facts.
Specific Requests versus negative judgment
Here are a few examples of how to change a negative judgment into a constructive request. Note that the most important part of the message is tone of voice.

E.g., Negative criticism: “You never help me with the dishes.”
Specific request: “It would be great if you’d help me with the dishes tonight.”

E.g., Negative criticism: “I hate it when you leave me hanging. You’re selfish and you care more about your friends than me.”
Specific request: “I felt worried and then angry when I expected you at 7 and didn’t hear from you until 9. Would you call me if you’re going to be late in the future?”

E.g., Negative criticism: “We never go out.”
Specific request: “I’d like to go out more. Let’s go out this weekend.”

Contempt and defensiveness
Contempt expresses the feeling of dislike toward somebody. It implies that he or she is worthless and undeserving of respect. Contempt is conveyed through insults, name-calling, tone of voice, as well as facial expressions. Contempt eats away at a relationship rapidly and painfully. A study has shown that people who make sour facial expressions when their spouses talk are likely to be separated within four years (Gottman, 1994).
In an atmosphere of contempt, partners find it difficult to remember one positive quality of their partners. Conflict escalates and prevents meaningful communication.
Here are several unpleasant ways to show one’s contempt:

1. Insults and name-calling are the most conspicuous and crude—you’re ugly, a jerk, a wimp, etc.

2. Hostile humor covers contempt with a thin veil of comic relief, often followed by the excuse, “I was just trying to be funny.” E.g., “Her cooking’s so bad she can’t even boil water.”

3. Mockery is a subtle put-down, where the spouse’s words or actions are ridiculed to show he or she is not worthy of respect or trust. A man may tell his wife, for example, “I really do care about you,” and she replies sarcastically, “Oh sure, you really do care about me.”

4. Body language, such as rolling one’s eyes or sneering, gives the clearest clue that a couple is in trouble.

What if you have a partner who holds contempt for you or criticizes you a lot?
1. Don’t be drawn into contempt, criticism or defensiveness. You can stand up for yourself, but without joining in the sneering, ridiculing, and hostile negative judgments.
2. Require an attitude of mutual respect as a foundation for any discussion. In a court of law, the procedural rules must be followed before the merits of the case can be heard. In relationship, the procedural rules require that both sides listen to the other person’s feelings and opinions respectfully. If the other person persists in showing contempt, suggest having a discussion in the presence of a counselor or mediator.
With an attitude of respect, people can discuss any difficult issues—sexuality, separation, weight problems, and money problems, for example. Without respect, you can’t discuss how to set the table without being inflammatory.
3. The most difficult but transformative course of action is to become aware of how we unknowingly feed the external critic (our partner), and thus participate in the cycle of contempt and criticism.
We all have an inner critic–the voice in our head that monitors our behavior. It prevents us from yelling in a movie theater or showing up at work three hours late. Yet, there’s a point where the inner critic no longer helps us but taunts and persecutes us without mercy. In some cases, the inner critic can completely block a person and cause despair. The inner critic is also what allows us to accept certain criticism regardless of its exaggeration or the scornful attitude in which it’s delivered.
Each person is usually vulnerable to specific types of criticism, probably because of childhood experiences or excessive criticism received in specific areas while growing up. The inner critic becomes excessively harsh in these areas in order to catch the person making “mistakes” before someone on the outside does. Criticism in these areas is experienced very painfully, and is either accepted without question or defended against adamantly. Thus, it turns out that our own inner critic becomes an ally of the external critic.

So, the most effective way of dealing with repeated criticism from the outside is to deal with these parts of our inner critic that are over zealous. We must become aware of the inner critic while it’s at work, and then attempt to moderate its over zealous attitude with reality. The external critic then loses its collaborator in us, making the affront less potent.
Imagine a woman was brought up to value courtesy and to detest rudeness. Her inner critic watches her behavior to make sure that she is friendly and nice. When her husband or children say, “you’re being mean” or “that’s rude”, she feels ashamed and hurt or becomes very defensive. If she had no hook in her—that is, no inner critic who’s severely offended by meanness and rudeness—her response would be less heated and intense. Without a strong hook, she might answer without anger or sarcasm, “That’s right, sometimes I am mean.” Or “I call it ‘being direct’, not rude.” Without a hook luring in certain criticisms, defensiveness loses its heat. As a result, the criticisms dissipate.
Imagine a man who has a strong inner critic about being lazy. Whenever he relaxes, there’s a voice in his head that says, “You’re lazy and good-for-nothing.” Suppose he’s on the couch reading a magazine, and hears his partner ask, “What are you doing?” That might be enough to activate his inner critic and make him sneer, “What’s wrong with relaxing once in a while?!” On the other hand, if he became aware of his excessive sensitivity due to his inner critic’s relentlessness, he might say without guilt or anger, “Just relaxing” or “I’m reading a great article from sunvalleyonline.com.”
Contempt is similar to criticism, although it is stronger in that it implies general worthlessness and inferiority. We need to become aware of how we participate in receiving contempt. It is our own inner hook that allows us to accept a scornful “you’re pathetic” or a tone of voice that says as much. Once we’ve modified our inner critic to improve our lives instead of humiliating and hindering us, then we might respond to contempt with a calm but poignant, “Excuse me? Are you sure you want to talk to me that way?”
It is not easy to become aware of the unconscious voices in our heads. Yet, it is exciting to think that through such awareness we can develop more choices in our lives— the choice of how we respond to our inner critic as well as the choice of how to respond to others’ criticism of us.


Recommended books:
Gottman, John, Ph.D. (1994). Why Marriages Succeed or Fail, Simon & Schuster, New York.

Stone, Hal, Ph.D., and Stone, Sidra, Ph.D. (1993). Embracing Your Inner Critic, HarperCollins Publisher, New York.

( Send comments to http://blog.sunvalleyonline.com/index.php/author/couples-solutions/ )

( or email Alison Poulsen at alisonpoulsen@cox.net )

Great Relationship Advice Part Nine, By Alison Poulsen, PhD

The Insidious Triangle:
How to avoid triangulation and gossip

Triangulation

Have you ever felt uneasy when a friend complains to you about his or her partner? Triangulation involves one person complaining to a third person about a primary relationship in order to temporarily vent anxiety, not to gain insight. Triangulation differs from having a conversation with someone to gain understanding or to seek options to deal with a problem.

Being drawn into triangulation is very draining, because you are asked to take sides rather than to have a dialogue. People may temporarily feel connected through the power of secrets, but in the end, inexhaustible complaining is emotionally enervating to everyone.

Although triangulating someone into an angst-ridden relationship may temporarily relieve anxiety, it is quite insidious. It is particularly harmful when one parent complains to a child about the other parent, because it puts extraordinary pressure on the child. The child generally wants any kind of connection he or she can get with a parent, even if that entails being a confidant, but feels discomfort and guilt in betraying the other parent.

Often, when anxiety overloads the initial triangle, others are triangulated into the process, thus forming a series of interlocking triangles. For example, a mother complains about her husband to her son, who then complains to his sister, who then complains to her father. Each person’s alliance is dependent on others’ anxiety and inability to relate directly to the person with whom they are experiencing problems. This is not a good foundation for developing life-enhancing relationships.

How do we avoid triangulation?

We should avoid taking sides, but remain in contact with both sides. We can express neutrality and objectivity, or use humor while relating to the mature part of the person venting. Here are some examples:

“I think it would be more helpful if you talked to him about how you feel, rather than to me.”

“Since we can’t change her, let’s figure out how you might have participated in this situation.”

“I value my friendship with both of you. So, I would prefer not being in the middle.”

“I feel uncomfortable when you tell me such private details of your married life.”

“I feel unqualified to give you advice. I think this is something you might bring to a therapist.”

“I think I know how this story is going to go. Do you see a pattern in the situation? Maybe you could do something differently.”

Gossip
Gossip is unconstrained and often derogatory conversation about other people, and can involve betraying a confidence and spreading sensitive information. Gossip is a form of triangulation, in that it is based on a desire to relieve anxiety by alienating others, whether or not one is in actual relationship with them.
Research shows that people who gossip the most have very high levels of anxiety. They are generally not particularly popular because they cannot be trusted (Dr. Rosnow). Spreading private information or negative judgments is painful to others and reflects poorly on the gossiper.
Why do people gossip?

To feel superior

People who don’t feel good about themselves temporarily feel better when they judge others negatively.

Out of envy

People gossip in order to hurt those whose popularity, talents, or lifestyle they envy.
To feel like part of the group


People gossip to feel as though they belong to the group. Yet, when a feeling of acceptance is based on being “in on a secret,” it is based on exclusion.
For attention


A person gets to be the center of attention temporarily while divulging a piece of gossip. Yet, spreading gossip or rumors is like buying attention—it’s temporary and has little foundation.
Out of boredom


When people can’t generate interesting discussions based on knowledge or ideas, gossip can rouse people’s interest.

Out of anger or unhappiness


A person can derive a sense of retribution with disparaging remarks.


Is it always wrong to talk about others?

It can be fine to talk about other people. Most people have a natural curiosity about what’s going on among people in the community. Some of the best books are biographies that tell the life stories of other people. However, the best biographies give the reader an understanding of the nuance and complexity of the person’s character through facts. They are not based on one-sided, offensive judgments of the person. The key is to look at one’s intent in discussing other people and relationships.

Is the intent to understand human nature or to improve the quality of life or relationships?

Or: Is it to temporarily feel superior by disparaging others?


Responses to unwelcome gossip:

Let’s suppose that somebody is gossiping mercilessly about Jane. We may not want to offend the other person, because we are all only human. Here are some possible responses:

“I notice that you talk about Jane a lot. I’m curious why she in particular interests you so much?”

“Let’s take a look at it from Jane’s side.”

“I am more interested in what you are up to.”

“Let’s talk about something more positive or inspiring, or make some plans.”

Conclusion

Gossip and triangulation diminish us and pull us down — both, the gossiper/triangulator and the listener. On the other hand, if we focus on understanding human beings rather than alienating them, everyone is apt to gain. Ultimately, insight into the intricacies of human relations and behavior is more interesting and enlightening than one-dimensional judgments and rumors.

Recommended Reading:

On triangulation: Kerr, Michael, and Bowen, Murray (1988), Family Evaluation, W. W. Norton & Company, New York.

On gossip: http://pbskids.org/itsmylife/friends/rumors/article4.html


( Send comments to http://blog.sunvalleyonline.com/index.php/author/couples-solutions/ )

( or email Alison Poulsen at alisonpoulsen@cox.net )

December 22, 2005

Reprinted Casa Magazine Essay by Neil Kapit


Being different is always a dangerous proposition. Fortunately for those of us who are, there are groups like the Academy of the Healing Arts ( AHA! for short ).

Recently I was diagnosed with a mild form of Asperger’s Syndrome, a high-functioning form of autism characterized by high intelligence, obsessive focus, motor skill impairments, and poor social skills. There is no single known cause, and there is no cure. Those of us with AS basically have to navigate human society blindly, working hard to learn the social cues that come naturally to everyone else. Needless to say, school has been a struggle for me; while I consistently get good grades, I have been bullied and harassed by my peers for no reason other than being an easy target. The only sanctuary I had was in comic books, an art form which I had obsessed over for years.

When I first came to AHA!, I had just come off of an extremely painful ninth grade year, and was desperately seeking friendship. I was welcomed there with open arms. I did not know how to respond to this at first; to be treated with kindness instead of hostility or judgment was an incredible shock. For months, I just sat in the corner of the room, listening to other people talk but never speaking myself.

Eventually, things started to change. Listening to other people’s challenges, I began to understand that I was not alone. There were others with similar problems, some even worse off than me. And they were all in the same room, ready and willing to support each other. As I learned about other people, I began to understand myself better, and was able to participate. I have been participating for five years since. What’s more, they encouraged me to follow my dreams of being a cartoonist, and I now have several published cartoons on the AHA! websites.

I’m not going to lie and say that I am cured of my problems. My condition is such that I will always have difficulty reading people, so it is very hard to trust anyone. Even in AHA!, where I know virtually everyone, I can’t always open up. But the program has been constant in my life. As I go to the groups, I know that everyone there cares. People who would never meet outside of AHA!, people from all sorts of different backgrounds, come together to form a community. They share their own personal challenges, and gain strength from each other. In a culture that teaches us to close off our feelings and pretend that we’re “ okay “, AHA! offers a chance to admit that we’re not, and work on our problems together.

The Academy of Healing Arts is a nonprofit program sponsored by the Family Therapy Institute, which has four after school groups for teens and young adults Monday through Thursday. There is also an intensive summer program for the participants every weekday morning in July, and an evening group for parents of the participants.

October 23, 2005

Great Relationship Advice by Alison Poulsen, Ph.D Part Seven

COUPLES SOLUTIONS: Parenting Together: Beyond Commands and Chaos
By Alison Poulsen
Tuesday, October 04, 2005
1. Parenting Approaches

Many couples struggle with their different parenting styles, one being generally strict and one laissez faire. We also struggle within ourselves—if we are too permissive and things become chaotic, we may explode with anger. If we are overly strict and that doesn’t work, we may give up completely. Often, one spouse allows the other to do all the parenting or to determine the style of parenting because of his or her fear of conflict. Although there’s no apparent struggle here, one spouse has given up his or her ability to take a stand in relation to the spouse and children—this is neither good for the relationship nor good role modeling for the children.

Differences between spouses on methods of parenting stem mostly from what each experienced from our own parents. Our primary parenting style is often either a reflection of or a negative response to the more dominant parenting style of our two parents. As such, it is deeply ingrained. The two dominant parenting styles—authoritarian and permissive—reflect two conflicting trends concerning what’s important in our culture. One trend places emphasis on the work ethic, which values productivity and organization. The other trend values freedom, which since the sixties has taken on the flavor of follow your bliss.

The Authoritarian

The hero myth and its emphasis on accomplishment are in large part responsible for the authoritarian in our western culture. The positive aspects of authoritarianism—efficiency and productivity—are important components in life and advantageous in the hero culture. When discipline becomes all encompassing, however, life loses something else of value.

Within the context of family, the authoritarian wants to efficiently achieve what needs to be done for “the child’s own good” through a commanding style. Many of us in contemporary western culture strive to lead and have our children lead “full” lives—mentally, athletically, and socially. To accomplish so much, we have to plan and organize rigorously, and are often left with little time and patience for simply hanging out with our children on their own terms of imagination and creativity. It seems that it is precisely during such unstructured time of play where there is no lectures or commands that the best connection between parents and children occurs. It is also the time where the imagination can run freely.

Authoritarianism sometimes stems from parents being driven to push their children to do the things they crave to do—becoming athletes, musicians, or scholars. When we find ourselves exerting excessive pressure on our children to accomplish what we once longed to accomplish, we need to consider whether we are making our children compensate for what is missing in our lives. While we should provide opportunities, engage in conversations about the benefits of such opportunities, and even insist on practice, let’s spare our children excessive pressure and control arising out of our own personal longings.

A child who feels overly controlled often feels resentful, angry, and impotent, and may lash out or become completely passive. While the child may be obedient, he or she lacks a sense of authentic power. Such a child may then try to find a sense of power by imitating his or her parents resulting in controlling or bullying behavior.

Because our culture scorns neediness, an authoritarian parent sometimes resorts to punishment, shame, and humiliation in an attempt to motivate a child or to eradicate any signs of weakness and dependence. Unfortunately, shame belittles and alienates rather than empowers a child, which in effect suppresses a child’s creativity and compassion. Excessive shame and punishment lead to feelings of impotence and can result in violent or passive aggressive behavior.

The Permissive Parent

Permissiveness in parenting sometimes stems from the desire to let the child’s creativity flourish and to avoid crushing the child’s sense of empowerment. Permissiveness can also result from not knowing how else to parent. It takes a great deal of effort to consistently engage a child and to take the time to encourage life-promoting behaviors and attitudes.

The fear of conflict also may lead a parent to over-indulge the child. When a child wants to stay up late or to skip soccer practice without a good reason, a parent dreads the child’s whining and protests if he or she is denied. Skipping one more activity seems a small price to pay. Yet, over the long term, responding to whining or begging may cause the behavior to become a pattern. Placating a child to minimize resistance only creates greater resistance in the future and into adulthood.

Although the child of a permissive parent may get more of her immediate desires fulfilled, the child often feels apprehensive about her excessive power and the chaos that ensues when she gets out of control. Lacking boundaries, the child can suffer from insecurity and find it difficult to cultivate self-discipline into adulthood. Such a child is denied the gift of being able to delay gratification—an ability necessary in attaining any long-term goals, and very important as an adult.

2. How do we establish boundaries and guidelines for our children without being too oppressive on the one hand and too permissive on the other?

In determining how we would like to parent our children, let’s examine the values at the core of each parenting style. The values at the core of strict discipline (the authoritarian) are responsibility, strength of character, and perseverance, all of which enable us to do things we don’t feel like doing, such as homework and demanding work. The values at the core of permissive parenting are respect, kindness, and creativity—qualities that make life enjoyable. The lenient parent fears that the child’s imagination and sensibilities will be crushed by an overbearing approach.

Both sets of values are essential and valid, and the good news is that they are not mutually exclusive. Both sets of needs can be met simultaneously. In fact, it is one-sided parenting that causes most problems. An excessively stern parent becomes machine that only values the child’s results and productivity, losing sight of the ineffable qualities of humanity—such as the joy of humor, imagination, and spontaneity—and the importance of feelings and relationships. The purpose of productivity loses its meaning when the vitality of life vanishes—a root problem of so many problems today.

In contrast, an excessively permissive parent cheats his or her child out of the ability to set goals and the self-discipline to achieve them. Without these abilities, one is left with the increasingly dissatisfying prospect of being fulfilled by being passively entertained. Not only is this not gratifying, it inevitably leads to dependence on others or on addictive behaviors that bring temporary relief from boredom of passivity.

Thus, children need both to be treated with respect and to learn self-discipline. Quite strict discipline can be effective if the manner of giving it is always loving, considerate, and done with a non-threatening manner and voice. You can, for instance, be extremely strict about the rule of a child's not going into the fenced-off swimming pool without a parent being present. The reasons can be explained firmly, though not threateningly. The child has to believe the parent is very serious, but not angry.

Respectful Parenting

The most important means of teaching our children is by being a role model and living the attributes we wish to impart to our children. Children watch their parents’ behavior more than they listen to their lectures. So, we can attempt to develop the qualities we desire in our children—empathy, respect, self-discipline, and patience.

The first step is to really listen to the child before responding. Empathy and respect are prerequisites for real dialogue with others. Respect differs from permissiveness in that it calls forth courtesy and allows for disagreement, rather than indulgence and agreement. Respect differs from obedience in that obedience is externally coerced through the use of fear or rewards, while respectful behavior is internally motivated by authentic power developed by being treated respectfully and expected to be responsible.

When parents use authentic power, they empower others. They motivate children by paying attention to feelings, needs, and desires. They help children develop control from inside themselves, maintained by the child’s own set of internalized values (Kvols, K.J., (1998). Redirecting Children’s Behavior. Washington: Parenting Press, Inc. p. 50).

We should express boundaries, expectations, disappointments, guidelines, and rules with kindness. We can be firm while expressing compassion. For example, when a child doesn’t want to go to soccer practice, we acknowledge that it’s part of life to not always feel like practicing, working, and following through with commitments. While validating such feelings, we can insist that they follow through anyway, unless there is a big problem or an urgent situation interfering. Not only are others on the team counting on us, but we can only enjoy increased skills and accomplishments if we generally do follow through with our commitments.

By stating expectations and creating boundaries for ourselves in a respectful way, we can prevent our boundaries from being trampled, and thereby reduce the possibility of conflict. This also teaches our children how to create boundaries in a respectful way for themselves and, later, how to take a stand in the world. If we want our children to be compassionate, respectful, self-empowered, and capable of both intimacy and solitude, we need to embody these attributes ourselves. It is an ongoing journey, challenging and rewarding, and of greater benefits to children and both spouses than harsh criticism or giving up could ever be.

3. How to get on the same page with your spouse about parenting children.

We can deal with our spouse, as well as all human beings for that matter, with respect and kindness, while clarifying our opinions, beliefs, expectations, and boundaries. We can start by recognizing and appreciating the values underlying his or her style of parenting. When we sincerely validate someone else’s needs or values, they are less apt to become defensive. This is not a manipulative maneuver. To have a meaningful discussion, we need to identify both our own concerns and desires while also considering our spouse’s needs and fears.

What are the core values of each parenting style? The authoritarian wants the child to develop the self-discipline and perseverance to make it in the world. The permissive parent desires that the child experience kindness, creativity, and compassion. We need to approach our spouse keeping the merits of both sets of values in mind.

In discussing parenting with our spouse, we don’t want to be authoritarian—using coercion, blame, and threats; nor do we want to be permissive, that is, doing anything to please or giving up boundaries completely. For example, a father or mother says overly sternly to his child “Go to bed!” when the child has come out of the bedroom to ask for something. Later, the spouse could say, “I agree that it’s important that the child go to bed early on school nights, and not get in the habit of getting up too often to ask for things. I also prefer that we use a kinder tone of voice in asking him to go to bed.”

Thus, we can convey to our partners respectfully rather than dictatorially. When we truly integrate both sets of values, not only do wild fluctuations between lenience and severity toward the children diminish, but we set a good example for the children, and struggles between spouses lessen.

Recommended book: Kvols, K.J., (1998). Redirecting Children’s Behavior. Washington: Parenting Press, Inc.

Great Relationship Advice by Alison Poulsen, Ph.D Part Six

COUPLES SOLUTIONS: Affairs of the Heart, Attractions outside the marriage
By Alison Poulsen
Monday, October 17, 2005
Question: My marriage is good on the whole, but recently my husband has developed an emotional relationship with another woman, which almost seems like an affair, except that it is not sexual. I’m not sure what’s worse—a sexual affair or an emotional affair. It’s making me very jealous and I’m not sure what I should do.

Discussion: While it is healthy and normal for people to have friendships outside the marriage with men and women, the fact that this relationship feels like an emotional “affair” suggests that it is supplanting the emotional bond between the two of you, or there is some sort of betrayal in its secrecy. Friendships are based on attraction, in that we are drawn to various qualities of our friends. Healthy friendships and attractions don’t need to threaten a marriage at all but add richness and enjoyment to life. When an attraction turns into an obsession or into an affair, it can become harmful to everyone involved.

The question as to whether an emotional or a sexual affair is worse varies from person to person. A sexual affair, except for very unusual circumstances, is a betrayal of the intimacy of the primary relationship. An emotional affair can be just as painful if the energy and time spent and the intimacy of that relationship are inordinate and thus damage the primary relationship. Jealousy, itself is often an important indicator that would suggest paying attention to what’s going on. However, don’t allow jealousy to lead to antagonism and possessiveness. It is more useful for the relationship for you to explore why it is that your partner is attracted to that particular person.

Often, attraction to another person indicates that something is missing in our life or relationship. No relationship can embody every possibility in life, because the relationship is limited by the experiences and capacities of the two people involved. Nor can we expect to satisfy every need and desire of each other.

Many needs have to be satisfied through our own personal development; yet, attractions can be informative in pointing out the qualities we are ready to bring into our lives and possibly also into the relationship. For example, a couple might have a financially stable situation, a secure family life, and an active social life. Yet, there might be a lot of potential for growth in the area of sensuality, adventure, or spirituality. The husband may find himself repeatedly drawn to sensuous women, or the wife might be drawn to rugged adventurers. Someone who lives primarily from the passions with his partner might be drawn to calm, spiritual types, and so forth. These circumstances would suggest that these qualities could be brought into the primary relationship. Specific efforts could be taken to become more sensual, take adventurous trips, or explore spirituality, for example.

To respond specifically to the question of the writer, your husband’s emotional involvement with another woman may be induced by the difference of her qualities. It is surprisingly helpful to communicate openly about such matters, despite taboos against doing so. Ask yourself or ask him without hostility what it is that draws him to her. For example, is it her ability to listen to him without criticizing him? Is it her carefree attitude? Is it the freedom from household and family concerns? Is it her interest in intellectual matters? Is it her nonchalance about social climbing? If he doesn’t know, you may need to speculate how this woman differs from you in a way that might be attractive to him.

The point is not to become like the other woman. The point is to become aware of the way in which your relationship may have become one sided to the point that there is a noticeable void, or, looking at it more positively, an opportunity for growth. In the case of attractions, it’s important not to become overly threatened and defensive, which constricts a person, but to respond to the possibility of growth within the relationship with an open and positive attitude. You’ll feel empowered when you look at the possibilities, instead of feeling defeated by agonizing over the status quo. The power comes from the choice you have in how to respond to your partner’s attraction to the other person; it may also come from responding positively to your own attractions to others. Rather than asking “what’s wrong with me?” ask “how can our relationship grow to be better?”

If the other woman seems to be truly interested in what your husband says, for example, you may notice that over the years you have paid less attention to what he says. No one likes to be treated as though he or she is not worthy of interest. This may be the time to refocus.

If the other woman seems to be a Bohemian artist type, ask yourself if your life together has become too conventional. This could be an opportunity to loosen up and allow some of your wild and creative sparks to seek expression in your own way.

If the other woman is very alluring, perhaps this is an area that has been ignored amidst the practicalities of family life. Desire begins within each of us and is not the responsibility of the other person. How could you feel more desirable again and allow that part of yourself to smolder once more?

These attractions indicate that we are ready to develop certain parts of ourselves within the relationship that are underdeveloped. The sooner we consider what specific attractions mean for us and our partners, the less likely they will turn into destructive affairs. Cultivating qualities that have been dormant enhances your own life and relationship. Moreover, if you cultivate lost or missing qualities that the other person seems to embody in your own authentic way, it is more than likely that the strength of the outside attraction will fade away.

For example, a man wonders why his wife is drawn to a self-indulgent man. Fortunately, he realizes that frugality pervasive in their marriage, which has led to financial security, is now constricting the marriage. If they loosen up and start to enjoy some of the fruits of their work together, the outside attraction is likely to diminish and it will add another dimension to their relationship. Note that in overly indulgent relationships a partner could become drawn toward somebody with foresight and self-restraint.

The trouble with having an affair, in addition to the pain it inflicts on all involved, is that we devalue primary parts of ourselves, which have significant value. Real integration of new qualities occurs without casting aside one’s primary parts of the personality and can often occur within the existing relationship. Real transformation can occur organically, without the dramatic swings that are painful to everyone involved.

It is quite exciting, particularly later in life, to discover your inner athlete when you’ve been in the office most of the time or to discover your inner Aphrodite when you’ve been tending the hearth. If we are more open about what attracts us and what we desire in our lives, we can help each other to develop a more multifaceted intimacy than we had ever dared imagine.

You may email questions or comments to alisonpoulsen@cox.net.

Recommended CD or tape: “Affairs and Attractions” by Drs. Hal and Sidra Stone.

September 25, 2005

Great Relationship Advice by Alison Poulsen, Ph.D Part Five

COUPLES SOLUTIONS: Embracing Growth in Relationship
By Alison Poulsen
Tuesday, September 20, 2005
Can a person’s continued education become a threat to the marriage? Sometimes it can, especially when the partner of the student feels threatened and becomes defensive as a result of it. An unspoken agreement exists in many marriages—“Don’t change. Don’t surpass me.” We want to stay in a comfort zone that we imagine means safety, but instead may result in diminishing the relationship and stifling both partners.

Suppose Maria decides to take a class or get another degree, John, her partner, may start feeling inadequate and worry about the security of their relationship if he compares himself to Maria who is learning and growing. As we can see, it is not the learning that constitutes the threat, but the fearful perception of the relationship.

Our tendency to judge and compare ourselves to others stems from the emphasis our culture places on competition. While competition may motivate and inspire us, it can also defeat our attempt to develop in our own unique way. Unfortunately, comparisons can create feelings of inferiority or superiority that can greatly affect our interaction with others. If Maria were to feel superior to John because of her studies, her arrogance and condescension would prevent vital and mutually loving interaction. If she were to suffer from feelings of inferiority, her feelings would also dampen the energetic connection between them.

When comparing ourselves to others, we deny our own human qualities and uniqueness, which cannot be measured or compared to others. Everyone is different and special in their own way. When we stand apart to rank, categorize and pigeon-hole ourselves and others, we are no longer our authentic selves. Only when we’re in our own skin, so to speak, can we truly link with others. While objective analysis is helpful in science and technology, in human relations we need an awareness of the energy between others and ourselves. The very heart of a relationship lies in that intangible zone of energy, where meaning comes from the tone, the look, and the feeling far more than from the level of people’s education and skills.

There are great benefits in encouraging a spouse to pursue their own path, whether it involves further education or other interests. First of all, there is nothing more loving and irresistibly attractive than having someone support us and believe in our endeavors and efforts. It builds our confidence when we take on challenges. It also may promote a reciprocal desire to encourage the partner to pursue his or her interests or find his or her own way of self-fulfillment, thus enriching both lives. Recall how Jack Nicholson in As Good as it Gets won over Helen Hunt by his sincere compliment, “You make me want to be a better man.”

Recent research shows that “a married man is significantly more satisfied with his life when his wife becomes more satisfied with hers, and vice versa."* British researcher Nick Powdthavee found that in married couples, happiness can overflow from one spouse to the other. Happiness can be contagious in marriage, even for a partner facing difficulties. The research shows that “married people become more satisfied with their life over the years merely because their spouses have become happier with theirs," says Powdthavee. Interestingly, the same results weren't seen among unmarried couples who lived together.

Education empowers people by engendering in them the ability to think with more nuance and complexity, an ability that can be transferred to different areas. Like any power, it can be used for good or for harm — to dominate people who know less or to empower people and enrich life.

Being with someone who has more knowledge in a certain area is like playing tennis with someone who plays a better game. He can either demolish you on the court or help you play a better game yourself. Similarly, the expert tennis player will enjoy the game more when the weaker player does not feel embarrassed and awkward, but appreciates the challenge and pleasure of having a talented partner.

Therefore, let us enjoy the ways in which our partners excel and let us support their growth, while we pursue our own interests with equal gratitude. The more we embrace the capacities and unique paths of friends and loved ones, the more our own world becomes infused with the fullness of their lives.

September 15, 2005

Great Relationship Advice from Alison Poulsen, Ph.D Part Four

COUPLES SOLUTIONS: Revelry and reason: Balancing Apollo and Dionysius
By Alison Poulsen
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
The Greek gods of mythology are archetypes of human behavior. Apollo represents order, light, music, and rationality, while Dionysius (the god of wine)represents revelry and release of inhibitions. Our culture is founded on Apollonian values of order; yet, we see Dionysian eruptions of excessive release. Conscious awareness of both the benefits and risks of excessive Apollonian order or Dionysian freedom allows us to navigate our lives through the pitfalls of excess. Each archetype has value, but taken in excess, can cause harm.

Order and freedom are two of many deep-seated needs that often conflict with one another. Thus, people tend to favor one to the exclusion of the other. Those who favor order may experience that need in terms of their physical surroundings, requiring that everything in the home and the office be clean, neat, and organized. Some may adhere strictly to a financial budget and require that every dollar is accounted for. Some experience the need for order in terms of schedules and careful planning. Others are concerned that their roles in relationship are well defined. Finally, order may be experienced as a need to clearly understand the world around us. For instance, rather than simply going out and skiing, the order seeker may be driven to understand everything about the technology of the equipment and the sport first.

Having order in one's world benefits a person by making life predictable, safe, and comfortable, while appeasing the fear of chaos and turmoil. Good planning and organization allow for more efficiency and getting more done. Yet, excessive emphasis on order drives out freedom and vitality. Too much order can lead to rigidity and lifelessness.

On the other hand, those who favor freedom value creativity, spontaneity, and reject being encumbered by rigid structures of schedules, budgets, house-cleaning, or conventional rules. They may prefer intuitive thinking rather than academic study. They prefer to be moved by inspiration rather than time constraints. They don't mind having a friend over if the house is messy. They might want to be generous or buy something because it delights them despite the condition of their finances. Their biggest fear is that life may become rigid, lifeless, and boring from too much control.

While freedom from structure allows for vitality and unpredictability, excessive freedom leads to chaos and frustration. When others can no longer count on you, their disappointment saps some of that sought-for joy of life. Too much freedom with spending can lead to financial ruin; too many missed appointments leads to loss of work and friends. Too much of anything life-enhancing can become harmful.

When both partners favor freedom excessively, the relationship may start with great fervor and passion, but over time, can disintegrate into chaos and disappointment. When both partners favor order excessively, the relationship may look good from the outside (nice house, good jobs, money in the bank), but it may become sterile and lifeless on the inside. When partners polarize, favoring opposite values, there is either great dissension or passive resignation to their differences.

Ideally, each partner in a relationship makes the effort to grapple with the tension of the opposite needs for order and freedom within their own selves. It's always helpful to integrate opposite qualities in small doses. If you are used to buying dinner for everyone and buying what you like on a whim, try restraining yourself now and then. Another benefit of integrating both values is that it's easier to understand and communicate compassionately with your partner. For instance, when one person understands the depth of the need for order and the fear of chaos underlying the desire for a spotless house, she can approach her partner with understanding of that need, while attempting to point out her need for a little looseness and relaxation.

The ideal balance of Apollonian and Dionysian energies is not a happy medium between the two. At work, for instance, being on time for appointments is generally preferable to a come-as-you-please attitude. On a date, however, sticking to a 10PM bedtime when the full moon is out and a romantic breeze is blowing might be a bad idea. Life ebbs and flows, and the appropriate proportion of control and release, which depends on all the surrounding circumstances, is in constant flux.

Great Relationship Advice from Alison Poulsen, Ph.D Part Three

COUPLES SOLUTIONS: The Compassionate Heart
By Alison Poulsen
Thursday, September 08, 2005
Compassion is at the very heart of good communication and meaningful relationships. Being compassionate entails imagining being in someone else’s shoes and desiring to ease their suffering. Suffering is the sorrow of having lost someone or something of meaning to us. Paradoxically, suffering is intimately linked with joy, for inherent in every moment of joy lies the potential of loss. Since the hours of joy are fleeting, they are tinged with the shadow of sadness. On the other hand, suffering also may retain some of the joy we once experienced, just as Blues music expresses suffering so beautifully. Witnessing suffering may bring meaning to the pain and can help move a person to the other side of suffering.

To be compassionate does not require fixing problems or agreeing with others. It only calls for giving someone your full attention and presence. If your partner feels that you’ve ignored him, you might not agree with his perception, but you can feel compassion for his state of mind. That does not mean listening to endless gripes and complaints, which can be exhausting and unproductive.

Should you have compassion for someone who is angry at you? Absolutely, even though it may not be easy! Once you look behind the anger, you may find fear and unmet desire. For example, if your partner is angry because you’re absorbed in your own activities, becoming defensive simply continues the cycle of anger and you may remain unaware that he or she feels somewhat abandoned and is unable to admit it. Once you truly see the hurt or fear driving the anger, there’s a good chance of communicating effectively about what really matters to each person.

Similarly, we need to be compassionate toward ourselves. Understanding the dynamic that leads us to lose our temper, for example, is more effective than harsh self-criticism. Looking for the fear or hurt beneath our temper allows us to find a better way to address it. Ruthless self-condemnation, on the other hand, simply buries the hurt or unmet need deeper until the situation is ripe for another explosion.

Compassion recognizes the humanity in all people, and accepts that all of us have our weaknesses. Yet, compassion does not mean condoning or tolerating abusive behavior. You can have compassion for someone who has hurt you or others, while still holding them accountable for their actions. If your spouse has had an affair, for example, although you might try to understand how that situation developed, you don’t need to accept the behavior. In fact, you need to protect yourself from further harm.

Compassion restrictors:
1. Communication without compassion imprisons us in a world of judgment. Judgment uses language that implies wrongness or badness. “You’re lazy.” “She’s selfish.” “He’s narcissistic.” Blame, insults, and labels don’t enhance life, they alienate it. It’s tempting to judge things as good or evil, right or wrong, or black or white, but we do so out of fear or contempt. No one’s needs, least of all our own, will be met that way.

2. Compassion can be blocked by using comparison as a form of judgment. Compare your own musical accomplishment to that of Mozart and you’ll feel thoroughly demoralized rather than inspired. But luckily, people are not alike, even though we are all human. We all have our own strengths and weaknesses.

3. The most dangerous barrier to compassion is the denial of responsibility for our actions. We all remember the Nazi system of invoking higher authority, which authorized normal people to commit horrendous crimes against humanity. When we deny responsibility for our actions, we enter dangerous territory and distance ourselves from our humanity. Even if we may be tempted to say, “she makes me unhappy or he makes me angry,” we need to take responsibility for our expectations, feelings, and actions. We can handle disappointments with understanding and compassion, and at the same time adjust our future expectations of those who continue to disappoint us.

You may email a comment or question to alisonpoulsen@cox.net.

An excellent book on the topic: Rosenberg, Marshall B. Ph.D., Nonviolent Communication, Puddledancer Press, CA, 2003.


Great Relationship Advice from Alison Poulsen, Ph.D Part Two

COUPLE SOLUTIONS: Pleaser vs. Receiver
By Alison Poulsen
Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Herman Hesse wrote in Narcissus and Goldman that in art and love, giving and taking become indistinguishable.

A common dynamic seen within couples is that one partner tends to please while the other tends to receive (the giver and the taker). These opposites attract each other, because they are complementary and each partner needs to develop some of the qualities of the other side. If each partner becomes more one-sided and excessive in giving or taking, the relationship becomes more and more oppressive and unsatisfying.

Ideally, both partners give and receive whole-heartedly for the right reasons without any strings attached.

What's wonderful about a pleaser (the giver) is that he or she is considerate, thoughtful, and has the other person's well-being and happiness in mind. Such a person is compassionate and able to feel into other people's needs and desires. Yet, if the pleaser becomes one-sided and excessive in doting over the partner, the partner can feel overwhelmed and stifled, feeling a burden of guilt toward the pleaser. The partner may sense that there is an underlying need to be needed and thanked, which causes him or her to withdraw. While it's normal to enjoy appreciation, excessive need for gratitude is draining and uncomfortable.

Sometimes when people split up, you hear "how could he leave her? She did everything for him?" As unfair as it may seem, that may be precisely the reason he left. It can feel belittling and overwhelming to have someone do too much for you.

Pleasers need to learn to ask for and receive what they desire from others. There really can be no true giving unless givers take care of themselves and are able to receive as well. They also need to develop the ability to let others take care of themselves on occasion, and to make sure their giving has no sense of reciprocal obligation or neediness attached.

Receivers are able to fully enjoy receiving from others, which is wonderful for both partners. Receivers feel self-contained and independent, and often don't feel they have to do a lot to please others because they feel quite satisfied in themselves. In order to be someone who can receive, you have to feel worthwhile and good enough about yourself to accept others' giving.

However, if someone simply takes and takes, without an ability or desire to give back, then there is a devouring quality in the receiving rather than joy and appreciation. A person who only receives and doesn't give to others has a sense of entitlement based on deficiency rather than self-worth. He or she seems selfish or greedy, and incurs resentment in those who continue to give. Similar to the Grinch who stole Christmas, such people seem to fear that they will become empty or lose part of themselves if they give too much. So instead, they tend to hoard what is brought their way.

Receivers, therefore, need to experience the pleasure and joy of thinking and doing for others. They will become more whole and full by giving to others. There is a sense that when you give from the heart, you also receive the joy of giving, and when you receive from another fully, you are giving them a gift in return.

Great Relationship Advice from Alison Poulsen Ph.D, Part 1

COUPLES SOLUTIONS: Time for Two
By Alison Poulsen
Tuesday, July 26, 2005
It’s important for couples to talk about work, parenting, money issues, and the practicalities of life. Yet, it’s also important for couples to spend time together simply enjoying each other’s company as they did when they first met. The busyness of life, particularly when there are children, makes it difficult to purposely make time to relish being together without a particular agenda or purpose.

When you spend all day being a responsible parent, planning schedules, giving advice, or dealing with controversies at work, it takes deliberation to switch into a connecting mode. If that conscious choice isn’t made, then couples tend to relate to each other as a responsible parents, for example, and the partners will respond as either a good child or as a rebellious child. Either way, it’s a parent/child relation. Or partners may relate as co-workers, which doesn’t do much for the magic in a relationship either.

The reason divorce rates are so high when children leave home for college or work is that couples don’t sustain their relationship as couples but relate primarily as co-parents, co-workers, or housemates. So, the powers of attraction and energetic connection—the Goddess of Aphrodite—have been left to wither in the cold. When the children leave home or life becomes less busy, the void and the longing for passion become obvious.

People complain that they’ve fallen out of love as though they have no choice about the matter. “Love” is often viewed as a feeling. However, “love” actually involves more than just fleeting feelings that come and go. Love requires an action over which we do have some control. So there is something we can do about sustaining love in a relationship.

The act of love involves choosing to have an attitude of appreciating our partner including their differences as we did when we fell in love. We fall in love and get a feeling of wholeness when we see someone who carries some qualities we lack in an attractive way. When we first fall in love, we’re in a state of awe and wonder regarding our partner, which coincidentally inspires our partner to feel confident and open—two appealing qualities. Later in relationship, those same contrasting qualities often drive us crazy. But the irony is that the more we criticize and try to change our partner, the more our partner carries those qualities in an annoying way. In contrast, the more we appreciate our partner, the more he or she carries those qualities in an attractive way, and thus, the more likely we are to get that loving feeling. It all starts with our own conscious choice to appreciate the differences, without denigrating our own different way of being, of course.

Practical steps to promote the connection between a couple include taking some time whether it’s 15 or 30 minutes a day to be together, having fun, being romantic, listening to music together, or having an adventure, as long as somehow time is taken to enjoy being together. Every week or so, a couple should spend a longer period of time together and consciously invite into the relationship the spirit of awe and mystery of being intimate with another human being.

June 15, 2005

A SIMPSON SENSIBILITY By NEIL KAPIT

A secret that's not so secret in my life is that the vast majority of my
sense of humor, when I choose to reveal it, is taken from the Simpsons. I
have found that just by quoting the venerable animated series, I can draw a
laugh in most scenarios. Obviously there are some situations where the
wisdom of Homer ( the nuclear technician, not the Greek poet ) don't apply,
but I'm hard pressed to think of them.

In fact, I'd not only say that the Simpsons is one of ( if not the )
funniest things to grace television ever, I'd say it's a major cultural
touchstone that should be required viewing for everyone. The appeal is
nigh-universal, and the breadth of topics the show covers is infinite. I've
seen just about every episode of the show, and they've covered everything
from politics to religion, from children to the elderly, from obscure
literature to pop culture, from alcoholism to zoos. There truly is something
for everyone.

But it's not just that the show addresses so many different topics, it's how
they do it, with endless wit and panache. They rarely just state the obvious
with an issue, they deal with it from multiple sides and show the many
different facets of the topic du jour. If an episode features an issue,
they'll address it from all angles. It's not like the other really popular
adult cartoon, South Park, where there's a heavy-handed ( usually right-wing
) moral, the Simpsons paints a more sophisticated picture of the world.

Then there's the little things. Each episode is chock full of all sorts of
little references and blurbs. It's not enough to have a main plot for each
show, the writers pack them with various little in-jokes and references to
pop culture, history, even previous episodes. The shows feel very heavy in
terms of content, like they're packed with information, rather than fluff
meant for mindless entertainment. ( I can't tell you how much trivia about
life and the world I've learned from following the show all these years ).

And finally, there's the cast. There is no show with as many memorable
characters. Obviously everyone knows the main family and some of the
recurring second-stringers, but the characters number in the hundreds, and
even one-note jokes make repeat performances. Who would have known that the
crusty old Sea Captain would become one of pop culture's most memorable
faces? Or that the Comic Book Guy would go on to single-handedly define an
entire subculture of fans? Well, if you watched the show, you probably would
have known by the quality of the episodes, but still.

So you mix topical relevance with intelligent writing with a great cast, and
you have a blueprint for what scripted TV should be ( and usually isn't ).
If you aren't watching the show regularly, you should be. It's your civic
duty.

A SIMPSON SENSIBILITY By NEIL KAPIT

A secret that's not so secret in my life is that the vast majority of my
sense of humor, when I choose to reveal it, is taken from the Simpsons. I
have found that just by quoting the venerable animated series, I can draw a
laugh in most scenarios. Obviously there are some situations where the
wisdom of Homer ( the nuclear technician, not the Greek poet ) don't apply,
but I'm hard pressed to think of them.

In fact, I'd not only say that the Simpsons is one of ( if not the )
funniest things to grace television ever, I'd say it's a major cultural
touchstone that should be required viewing for everyone. The appeal is
nigh-universal, and the breadth of topics the show covers is infinite. I've
seen just about every episode of the show, and they've covered everything
from politics to religion, from children to the elderly, from obscure
literature to pop culture, from alcoholism to zoos. There truly is something
for everyone.

But it's not just that the show addresses so many different topics, it's how
they do it, with endless wit and panache. They rarely just state the obvious
with an issue, they deal with it from multiple sides and show the many
different facets of the topic du jour. If an episode features an issue,
they'll address it from all angles. It's not like the other really popular
adult cartoon, South Park, where there's a heavy-handed ( usually right-wing
) moral, the Simpsons paints a more sophisticated picture of the world.

Then there's the little things. Each episode is chock full of all sorts of
little references and blurbs. It's not enough to have a main plot for each
show, the writers pack them with various little in-jokes and references to
pop culture, history, even previous episodes. The shows feel very heavy in
terms of content, like they're packed with information, rather than fluff
meant for mindless entertainment. ( I can't tell you how much trivia about
life and the world I've learned from following the show all these years ).

And finally, there's the cast. There is no show with as many memorable
characters. Obviously everyone knows the main family and some of the
recurring second-stringers, but the characters number in the hundreds, and
even one-note jokes make repeat performances. Who would have known that the
crusty old Sea Captain would become one of pop culture's most memorable
faces? Or that the Comic Book Guy would go on to single-handedly define an
entire subculture of fans? Well, if you watched the show, you probably would
have known by the quality of the episodes, but still.

So you mix topical relevance with intelligent writing with a great cast, and
you have a blueprint for what scripted TV should be ( and usually isn't ).
If you aren't watching the show regularly, you should be. It's your civic
duty.

ANOTHER NEIL KAPIT COMMENTARY

There's been a lot of talk about the living situation of the current
generation of young adults-- specifically, that they haven't moved out yet.
Called the "adultolescents" or "twixters" or whatever clever euphemism
the media has come up with, these young people still live at home after
school, and are still supported by their parents.

Whenever the media writes about these "twixters", no matter how hard they
try to be fair and balanced, there's always a hint of condescension, even
scorn. The articles imply that there's something wrong with the
adultolescent generation, that they haven't been able to find a job and move
out like the previous generation could. They're portrayed as immature, lazy
slackers, Peter Pans who never want to grow up. Their problems could be
solved by supporting themselves.

Unfortunately, supporting yourself as a young person in America isn't as
easy as many would have you believe.

Ask almost any young person trying to find a job; it's just difficult to
find work. Especially good work, the kind of work that someone would
actually want. Even menial jobs are tough to acquire. Speaking from personal
experience, I have not been able to find an entry-level position after much
searching and frustration. Many of my peers are in the same boat, as well.

How did this happen? Part of it may be due to the shrinking middle class,
the expanding gap between the rich and poor. The good jobs are moving into
the white collar sector, while the more menial jobs are paying less and
requiring more hours. Many jobs have been lost since the Bush Administration
took hold of this country, and benefits are being garnished as well as wages
for the jobs that exist.

It's a complex situation, but one thing is for sure-- with the economy the
way it is, supporting oneself ( especially in a luxurious town like Santa
Barbara ) is no small feat. Finding a job in order to make ends meet is
difficult for an inexperienced young person; finding a job that supports a
comfortable living is even harder. Is it any wonder that so many young
people instead decide to stay at home, with Mom and Dad footing the bill?

These people are not necessarily lazy and unmotivated slackers. Many are
trying to get meaningful employment. They just can't find it, and without
that, couldn't make it on their own. Maybe they just can't leave the nest,
but it's hard for the proverbial hatchling to leave its nest when there are
gale force winds blowing through the trees.

So next time you hear about the "adultolescents" and "twixters", reserve
judgment. Don't chastise them immediately for not moving out sooner.
Everyone matures at a different rate, and sometimes the tools needed for
proper maturation are hard to acquire. Especially with the economy the way
it is.

ANOTHER NEIL KAPIT COMMENTARY

There's been a lot of talk about the living situation of the current
generation of young adults-- specifically, that they haven't moved out yet.
Called the "adultolescents" or "twixters" or whatever clever euphemism
the media has come up with, these young people still live at home after
school, and are still supported by their parents.

Whenever the media writes about these "twixters", no matter how hard they
try to be fair and balanced, there's always a hint of condescension, even
scorn. The articles imply that there's something wrong with the
adultolescent generation, that they haven't been able to find a job and move
out like the previous generation could. They're portrayed as immature, lazy
slackers, Peter Pans who never want to grow up. Their problems could be
solved by supporting themselves.

Unfortunately, supporting yourself as a young person in America isn't as
easy as many would have you believe.

Ask almost any young person trying to find a job; it's just difficult to
find work. Especially good work, the kind of work that someone would
actually want. Even menial jobs are tough to acquire. Speaking from personal
experience, I have not been able to find an entry-level position after much
searching and frustration. Many of my peers are in the same boat, as well.

How did this happen? Part of it may be due to the shrinking middle class,
the expanding gap between the rich and poor. The good jobs are moving into
the white collar sector, while the more menial jobs are paying less and
requiring more hours. Many jobs have been lost since the Bush Administration
took hold of this country, and benefits are being garnished as well as wages
for the jobs that exist.

It's a complex situation, but one thing is for sure-- with the economy the
way it is, supporting oneself ( especially in a luxurious town like Santa
Barbara ) is no small feat. Finding a job in order to